<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Under Montreal &#187; Interceptor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.undermontreal.com/tag/interceptor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.undermontreal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A History of Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.undermontreal.com/montreal-wastewater-treatment-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.undermontreal.com/montreal-wastewater-treatment-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[subfeature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interceptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wastewater Treatment Plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.undermontreal.com/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of sight, out of mind. Montreal's long and troubled history involving sewage treatment and water pollution issues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-medium wp-image-895" style="width:545px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/treatmentplant_tanks.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/treatmentplant_tanks-545x363.jpg" alt="treatmentplant_tanks" width="545" height="363" /></a>
	<div>Grit removal tanks of Montreal's wastewater treatment plant.</div>
</div>
<p>Montreal’s wastewater treatment plant can be <a href="http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=montreal&amp;sll=49.891235,-97.15369&amp;sspn=50.787129,135.263672&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=45.674553,-73.52319&amp;spn=0.013344,0.033023&amp;t=h&amp;z=16" target="_blank">found</a> at the far east end of the island in Pointe Aux Trembles. It&#8217;s the largest in North America and ranks the third largest in the world- capable of handling 32 cubic metres of water a second.  Raw sewage (usually) ends up here via a network of deep-level tunnels referred to as interceptors. These interceptors form a ring around the island, collecting and distributing wastewater to the plant before it has a chance to enter the surrounding rivers. To get a better sense of how the interceptors work, you can have a look at the entry I wrote  <a href="www.undermontreal.com/montreal-interceptor-sewer-system/" target="_self">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-medium wp-image-894" style="width:545px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/treatmentplant_aerial.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/treatmentplant_aerial-545x376.jpg" alt="treatmentplant_aerial" width="545" height="376" /></a>
	<div>Montreal's wastewater treatment plant as seen from Microsoft Live Maps.</div>
</div>
<p>While it’s an impressive system in terms of its scope and capacity, the treatment process itself leaves much to be desired. In fact, it’s actually one of the worst in Canada. A national &#8220;<a href="http://www.ecojustice.ca/publications/reports/national-sewage-report-card-iii/attachment" target="_blank">report card</a>&#8221; issued by the Sierra Club in 2004 gave the city&#8217;s treatment process a grade of <a href="http://www.macleans.ca/canada/national/article.jsp?content=20051017_113292_113292" target="_blank">F-</a>. The only other city to receive a grade worse than Montreal was Victoria, a place which doesn&#8217;t even have a treatment process in place yet.</p>
<p><span id="more-885"></span></p>
<p>The biggest problem is that the plant only provides primary treatment of its sewage. Most other cities across Canada deliver secondary and even tertiary treatment of wastewater resulting in far cleaner water. By comparison, the effluent from Montreal&#8217;s plant remains full of <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090126112427.htm" target="_blank">pharmaceuticals</a>, heavy metals, and a multitude of other contaminants. While this pollution is usually kept clear from the shores of Montreal, it inevitably ends up somewhere downstream of the island where the effluent has been known to be <a href="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=35ddce87-580c-40b1-8d52-2f94a84d2877" target="_blank">wreaking havoc</a> with the river&#8217;s ecosystem.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-full wp-image-901" style="width:545px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/effluentstream.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/effluentstream.jpg" alt="effluentstream" width="545" height="383" /></a>
	<div>Effluent plume from the treatment plant's discharge location east of Pointe Aux Trembles. Source: Environment Canada</div>
</div>
<p>Even during the era of its conception during the late 1960s, Montreal’s proposed treatment plant was deemed to be inadequate to solve the problem of worsening water pollution. Secondary treatment schemes were entertained, but the costs involved were considered too high for it to be considered feasible. Instead, the plan was to incorporate additional levels of treatment to the plant after it was completed, which at the time was expected to be 1981. It was thought that by then “cheaper and better schemes may be available.”</p>
<p>Montreal has always been behind the times in terms of sewage treatment. While much time and money was put into developing its large-scale collector sewers between 1920 and 1965, their contents simply flowed directly out into the open waters surrounding the island.</p>
<p><strong>Baby Steps</strong></p>
<p>Perhaps anticipating future problems, in 1930, the Province of Quebec ordered that Montreal start treating some of the sewage flowing into Riviere Des Prairies. Shortly thereafter, Montreal began work on the North Interceptor. This 14 foot tunnel was intended to transfer sewage towards a site on Isle de la Visitation where it was thought that a local treatment plant could eventually be built. The interceptor was such a low priority that it took 25 years to complete. As for the proposed treatment plant, ground was never even broken and by 1967, plans for its construction were officially scrapped.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-full wp-image-896" style="width:540px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/northinterceptor_outlet.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/northinterceptor_outlet.jpg" alt="northinterceptor_outlet" width="540" height="500" /></a>
	<div>Final inspection of the North Interceptor sewer in 1955, 25 years after the start of its construction. Source: City Archives of Montreal</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>From Bad to Worse</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-889" style="width:545px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/riversewagecartoon.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/riversewagecartoon-545x352.jpg" alt="riversewagecartoon" width="545" height="352" /></a>
	<div>Editorial cartoon from 1945 - &quot;O rivières de chou nous!&quot;</div>
</div>
<p>For close to a century, Montreal could always rely on the swift-moving waters of the St. Lawrence, Riviere des Prairies to whisk sewage away from the island.  However, by the 1940s, it was becoming obvious that this practice was no longer working as well as it had in the past. Public swimming areas around the island were being forced to close. The waters were starting to foul. Clearly, there was no way of hiding the fact that the practice of continuously dumping sewage into the open waters was causing problems. Still, it would take another thirty years before concrete steps would be taken to help remedy the situation.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/st-helens-island-beach-1941_sm.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-890" src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/st-helens-island-beach-1937_sm-545x393.jpg" alt="st-helens-island-beach-1937_sm" width="545" height="393" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-medium wp-image-891" style="width:545px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/st-helens-island-beach-1941_sm.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/st-helens-island-beach-1941_sm-545x393.jpg" alt="st-helens-island-beach-1941_sm" width="545" height="393" /></a>
	<div>Isle St. Helen beach signage - from no littering in 1937 to no bathing in 1941. Source: Pistard Archives </div>
</div>
<p>By the 1960s, an average of 400+ million gallons of sewage a day was being discharged directly into the waters surrounding the island.  By contrast, during this same period, Toronto was cleaning 98% of its wastewater using a combination of four treatment plants. Montreal couldn&#8217;t claim to match this percentage until 1996. It would be the last major city in North America to start treating its sewage.</p>
<p><strong>Starting to Get Serious</strong></p>
<div class="img aligncenter size-medium wp-image-892" style="width:545px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/initial_interceptor_system_proposal.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/initial_interceptor_system_proposal-545x340.jpg" alt="initial_interceptor_system_proposal" width="545" height="340" /></a>
	<div>1970 map showing preliminary paths of the island's interceptors and locations of its treatment facilities. Source: City Archives of Montreal</div>
</div>
<p>In the summer of 1967, during the middle of Expo, mayor Jean Drapeau’s engineering department released a report proposing, not one, but two treatment plants for the island- one which could handle the north/east watershed and another for the south/west encompassing downtown Montreal. Over the next few years, much debate amongst the island&#8217;s communities took place involving  where these facilities would be located, how much could be spent and when they might be completed.  A site adjacent to the Victoria Bridge (previously used as a parking lot for Expo) was considered as was Isle St-Therese, but both were later shelved due to &#8220;environmental concerns.&#8221; Years would pass before a master plan was drafted.</p>
<p>It was eventually decided to build just one treatment plant in Point Aux Trembles  and eventually use it to treat all the island&#8217;s municipalities&#8217; sewage. Both the North Interceptor and the St-Pierre collector system would be incorporated into the plan- measures which city officials claimed would help save millions of dollars. Work finally commenced in 1974 with the expansion of the North Interceptor. It was expected that the system could be completed and functioning by 1981. Turned out they were about 15 years off the mark.</p>
<p><strong>Sewerage Scandals</strong></p>
<p>The website for Montreal’s treatment plant provides a <a href="http://services.ville.montreal.qc.ca/station/an/histstaa.htm" target="_blank">timeline</a> highlighting key dates in the construction of its treatment system. It’s a decent overview, but it conveniently leaves out all the problems encountered along the way. There are no indications as to why the project took close to twenty years to complete at cost of over a billion dollars more than the initial estimates.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><div class="img aligncenter size-full wp-image-893" style="width:540px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/interceptor_chart.jpg" rel="lightbox[885]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/2009/07/interceptor_chart.jpg" alt="interceptor_chart" width="540" height="334" /></a>
	<div>Graph from 1976 showing the escalating costs of the treatment project based on rising inflation and a completion date of 1986. Source: City Archives of Montreal</div>
</div>
<p>To go through that history of problems in detail would take far too long for one blog entry,  but one can get a sense of it all by reading through the newspaper headlines that appeared over the duration of the project.</p>
<p>1964 – &#8220;Sewage plant site Marked&#8221;<br />
1967 – &#8220;Construction of wastewater treatment plant to cost $131,000,000&#8243;<br />
1968 – &#8220;Roxboro residents warned: don’t swim in the Back River&#8221;<br />
1969 – &#8220;Town of Mount Royal against city on new sewage plant&#8221;<br />
1970 – &#8220;Clean air group claims sewage project ‘Waste of Money’&#8221;<br />
1971 – &#8220;Montreal’s sewage treatment plan probed further by Quebec&#8221;<br />
1971 – &#8220;Montreal to build $300,000,000 sewage disposal plant&#8221;<br />
1973 – &#8220;Quebec tells Montreal to accelerate work on sewage system&#8221;<br />
1974 – &#8220;Quick start to sewer plan urged&#8221;<br />
1974 – &#8220;Pollution ratings close eight more area beaches&#8221;<br />
1974 – &#8220;Montreal’s $500,000,000 sewage clean up&#8221;<br />
1975 – &#8220;Executive committee seeks tender control&#8221;<br />
1975 – &#8220;Quebec to pay half Montreal’s sewage nill&#8221;<br />
1976 – &#8220;Economic woes threaten metro, sewage line work&#8221;<br />
1976 – &#8220;Sewage plant, metro delayed&#8221;<br />
1976 – &#8220;Is the Saint Lawrence an open sewer?&#8221;<br />
1977 – &#8220;Province suspends sewage project&#8221;<br />
1977 – &#8220;Sewage contracts stopped by Montreal&#8221;<br />
1977 – &#8220;Costly sewer system simply shifts the problem&#8221;<br />
1978 – &#8220;Back River Clean by 1986&#8243;<br />
1978 – &#8220;Our sewage scandal: big plans but still little action&#8221;<br />
1979 – &#8220;First phase completed of Montreal’s $1.2 billion sewage clean-up&#8221;<br />
1979 &#8211; &#8220;$240 million sewer line awaits as city argues with suburbs&#8221;<br />
1980 – &#8220;Time to take the plunger&#8221;<br />
1983 – &#8220;Montreal wants Quebec action on huge southern sewer line&#8221;<br />
1985 – &#8220;Dumping sewage into our rivers: there’s light at the end of the tunnel&#8221;<br />
1985 – &#8220;Sewage pipe polluting 20km of river: experts&#8221;<br />
1986 – &#8220;Boat will tour St. Lawrence sewer dumps&#8221;<br />
1987 – &#8220;Push of button officially starts sewage plant&#8221;<br />
1987 – &#8220;Montreal sewage plant called oversized, substandard&#8221;<br />
1988 – &#8220;Not cleaned up yet&#8221;<br />
1989 – &#8220;Waste spills into river after plant breakdown&#8221;<br />
1990 – &#8220;Sewage plans running late, completion set back to ’94 by problems&#8221;</p>
<p>You get the idea&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Completion and Beyond</strong></p>
<p>Finally, by 1998 all portions of the interceptor network had been completed and was being used to transfer most of the island&#8217;s sewage to the treatment facility. Being grossly over budget and over schedule, the original plan to introduce secondary treatment never came. Having already been considered obsolete during its conception, today&#8217;s plant is in dire need of upgrading if it&#8217;s to match the expectations of the 21st century. An <a href="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?k=30073&amp;id=341f4a81-34b1-44a4-a6f9-8b92cc99c51c" target="_blank">announcement</a> was made last year that Montreal would be seeking $200 million to help convert the plant into an <a href="http://www.excelwater.com/eng/b2c/ozone.php" target="_blank">ozonation treatment</a> facility. The conversion would make it the largest city in the world to be using this more efficient process, but so far details have been vague and it&#8217;s questionable as to how and when all this might happen.</p>
<p>But despite the fact  the existing plant is behind the times in terms of treatment, it does do an adequate job of handling large amounts of wastewater. As well, the large-diameter interceptors can usually accommodate heavy rainfalls, which means a lower percentage of raw sewage ends up in the rivers when compared to other cities such as Toronto. As a result, the water around the island is a great deal cleaner than it used to be— enough so that the water is now deemed suitable for swimming.  While the number of recreational beaches on the island has dropped from over 20 in the 1940s to only two today, they can still be used. It&#8217;s better than nothing, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.undermontreal.com/montreal-wastewater-treatment-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspecting the Interceptors</title>
		<link>http://www.undermontreal.com/montreal-interceptor-sewer-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.undermontreal.com/montreal-interceptor-sewer-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interceptor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.undermontreal.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A guide to Montreal's interceptor sewer network and the traces of it to be found within the visible urban landscape.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-365" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/lid.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/lid-530x355.jpg" alt="A typical interceptor manhole cover. C.U.M. is the abreviation for Communauté urbaine de Montréal. " width="530" height="355" /></a>
	<div>A typical interceptor manhole cover.</div>
</div>
<p>If there&#8217;s one thing that strikes fear into the hearts and minds of Montreal drainers (all three of us), it&#8217;s the island&#8217;s deep-level network of interceptor sewers. They are big concrete tunnels (up to 14.5 meters in diameter), often running at 100 feet below grade and with a ferocious amount of raw sewage coursing through them. All the wastewater of Montreal eventually drops down into one of these three tunnels. Our biggest fear is that we&#8217;d somehow end up going straight down there with it.</p>
<p>Because of this, we tend to keep our distance from anything marked &#8220;Intercepteur&#8221; and avoid passing through sections of sewers that come close to emptying into them.</p>
<p>Fortunately, there are  still ways to have a look at the network from a safe distance.</p>
<p><span id="more-359"></span></p>
<div class="img alignnone" style="width:500px;">
	<img src="http://services.ville.montreal.qc.ca/station/fr/images/Img2027g.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="368" />
	<div>Construction of the southeastern interceptor, most likely taken during the early 90s. Source: services.ville.montreal.qc.ca</div>
</div>
<p>The interceptor&#8217;s primary role is to collect the island&#8217;s sewage and storm runoff and transfer it to the island&#8217;s  treatment plant before it has a chance to flow into the surrounding water.  This might seem like common sense, but Montreal didn&#8217;t even have a functioning treatment plant until 1987 and at that time only a portion of this network had been completed. It would take eight more years before the entire system was completed, twenty five years after its construction was first ordered.</p>
<p>The network is divided into three distinct parts and looks a little something like this:</p>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-363" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/interceptor_overview.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/interceptor_overview-530x326.jpg" alt="The island of Montreal's three interceptor lines (shown here in red) and locations of various control structures." width="530" height="326" /></a>
	<div>The island of Montreal's three interceptor lines (shown here in red) and locations of various control structures.</div>
</div>
<p>Downtown Montreal&#8217;s sewage falls into the Southeastern interceptor before being fed by gravity towards the treatment plant in Pointe-Aux-Trembles a good twenty kilometers away.</p>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-362" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/interceptor_detail.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/interceptor_detail-530x399.jpg" alt="Detail showing typical interceptor and collectorisewer intersection. A pumping station sits at the point where these lines intersect." width="530" height="399" /></a>
	<div>Detail showing typical interceptor and collector sewer intersection. A pumping station sits at the point where these lines meet.</div>
</div>
<p>Most of the time this system works quite well and everything gets treated before being discharged back into the environment. The problems come during prolonged periods of rain. The treatment plant reaches maximum capacity, leaving no choice but to let the excess flow drain out into the open water. These combined sewer overflow (CSO) events are symptomatic of older cities like Montreal, and not surprisingly are the source of much pollution.  However, it&#8217;s somewhat of a small price to pay given that before this system was put in place, raw sewage was flowing out into the environment 24/7 every day of the year. Once you know this,  it&#8217;s hard to complain about the odd overflow taking place.</p>
<p>The network of tunnels is of course hidden from view,  but its corresponding  infrastructure can be found above ground if you know where to look. Roughly 70 components consisting of pumping stations, diversion structures, gate chambers and inspection points dot the urban landscape. Their designs range from quirky to elegant to mundane.</p>
<p>A few found in and around the downtown area:</p>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-366" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mcgill_ps.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mcgill_ps-530x353.jpg" alt="One of the more ornate pumping stations at Mcgill and Wellington that also doubles as an &quot;interpretive look-out&quot; for tourists. Not surprisingly, there's mention of the sewers below." width="530" height="353" /></a>
	<div>One of the more ornate pumping stations at Mcgill and Wellington that also doubles as an &quot;interpretive look-out&quot; for tourists. Not surprisingly, there's mention of the sewers below.</div>
</div>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-367" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/riverside_rs.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/riverside_rs-530x354.jpg" alt="A more austere-looking regulating structure on Riverside adjacent to Highway Bonaventure." width="530" height="354" /></a>
	<div>A more austere-looking regulating structure on Riverside adjacent to Highway Bonaventure.</div>
</div>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-360" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/nicolet_shaft.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/nicolet_shaft-530x353.jpg" alt="Brutalist-style inspection shaft entrance structure on Notre Dame East near Pie IX blvd." width="530" height="353" /></a>
	<div>Brutalist-style inspection shaft entrance structure on Notre Dame East near Pie IX blvd.</div>
</div>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-371" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ventilation.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ventilation-530x353.jpg" alt="Ventilated panels covering the top of an inspection shaft." width="530" height="353" /></a>
	<div>Ventilated panels covering the top of an inspection shaft.</div>
</div>
<p>The interceptor tunnels also provide a convenient way to get rid of snow after its been plowed from the streets. Perhaps not as convenient as just dumping it into river, but ever since the city prohibited it tossing it straight into the sewer system is the next best thing.</p>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-361" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/bellerive_dump.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/bellerive_dump-530x353.jpg" alt="Bellerive Snow Dump at Notre Dame and Parthenais." width="530" height="353" /></a>
	<div>Bellerive Snow Dump at Notre Dame and Parthenais.</div>
</div>
<div class="img alignnone size-medium wp-image-372" style="width:530px;">
	<a href="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/snowlids.jpg" rel="lightbox[359]"><img src="http://um-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/snowlids-530x353.jpg" alt="Panels covering one Bellerive's three chutes used for snow disposal." width="530" height="353" /></a>
	<div>Panels covering one Bellerive's three chutes used for snow disposal.</div>
</div>
<p><strong>Further reading:</strong> <a href="http://services.ville.montreal.qc.ca/station/an/pdf/network.pdf" target="_blank">Interception Network and Construction Stages.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.undermontreal.com/montreal-interceptor-sewer-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

